State of the Environment Reporting Network for
Southern Africa |
SOENETSA NEWSLETTER
Vol. 1 No. 3, August 2000
| Editorial | Africa Steps Up Efforts to Promote Information Use in Decision Making l |Study Identifies Regional SOE Needs | Southern African Environmental Information Centres Take Steps to Develop Regional Thesaurus | Water And Wetland Resources Play a Crucial Role in the Zambezi Basin |Women Dress a Hill |Advocacy Takes Centre Stage in Environmental Law Making | About the SOENETSA Newsletter |
Editorial: Sharing Information Vital for Environmental Management
The regional
integration process in southern Africa has been a long and slow process, resulting in the
signing of a number of protocols and agreements. Of
note is the recent approval of the SADC free trade pact in Windhoek, Namibia, which is
expected to boost intra-regional trade.
Economic and
political integration in the region has some direct and indirect impacts on the
environment. It is vital that in the process
of integration, environmental concerns are shared and debated on to ensure sustainable
development.
It is gratifying to
note that most development projects in the region take environmental concerns into
consideration as environmental advocacy has taken centre stage across the region. The involvement of all the stakeholders in law
making and policy development is a crucial ingredient to sound development as it captures
the collective wisdom affected communities and the law makers.
At the
international level, a number of consultative initiatives on sustainable natural resources
management have been undertaken, one of which is the Global Dialogue. The Global Dialogue is a platform for debate on
the protection of resources. Deliberations
from this platform also feed into other sustainable development initiatives including
international and regional conventions.
These initiatives
would in themselves not be enough if the knowledge gathered from them is not communicated
to all the stakeholders. Reporting on the
different activities, and on the status of the environment at all levels would assist in
making sound decisions and prevent environmental degradation when there is still time.
It is sad to note
that most of the Southern African Development Community (SADC) member states do not
practice regular state of the environment reporting.
Even for those that do, there are no clear methodologies. There is therefore, the need to have at least some
common regional platform for state of the environment reporting.
By Joshua Chigodora
Alternate Network Facilitator
Africa Steps Up Efforts to Promote Information Use in
Decision Making
By Clever Mafuta
Africas quest
for sustainable management and utilisation of environmental resources received a major
boost when a recent consultative meeting agreed to broaden the mandate of the Programme on
Environmental Information Systems in Sub-Saharan Africa (EIS Africa Programme). The
programme, which has since been turned into a not-for-profit Section 21 Company registered
in South Africa, where it is hosted, will significantly improve state-of-the environment
reporting by putting in place the necessary institutional and data infrastructure to
support the process.
The EIS programme
has over the past decade promoted greater use of harmonised geo-spatial data, and in so
doing facilitated the strategic development and use of information in support of effective
management of environmental resources for development. However, easy access to
policy-relevant information remains a critical challenge in sub-Saharan Africa.
In his opening
remarks, Dave MacDevette of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) highlighted
the immense role played by environmental information systems (EIS) in supporting global
state-of-the-environment (SOE) reporting processes such as the Global Environment Outlook.
Similarly EIS activities play crucial roles in national and sub-regional SOE reporting,
although currently such activities are not well developed in the sub-continent.
Major achievements
of the EIS Programme in Africa include awareness creation through country case studies,
the promotion of data harmonisation and standardisation, as well as facilitating data
sharing.
Under the new
arrangement, the EIS Africa Programme is set to become a pan-African non-governmental
organisation made up of partnerships, with the goal of enhancing geographical information
brokeraging, as well as providing support for policy research studies. Through the
provision of basic datasets the EIS programme will have significant inputs in on-going
national and sub-regional programmes such as land reform, food security, poverty
alleviation, decentralisation and the implementation of global conventions at the local,
national and sub-regional levels.
The SADC region has
the longest sustained sub-regional EIS development in sub-Saharan Africa. According to
Kennedy Masamvu, the Coordinator for the SADC Regional Remote Sensing Unit (RRSU), formal
EIS activities in the SADC region started in 1992. In 1995 two activities, namely the EIS
Database Development and Networking, and the Training and Education programmes were
launched. In addition, a SADC EIS Policy Framework document has been prepared and approved
by the SADC Environment and Land Management Sector Technical Committee. The document is
now awaiting approval by the SADC Council of Ministers. Furthermore, the SADC RRSU,
working in collaboration with other partners, has developed a harmonised, small-scale
topographic dataset for the entire SADC region.
The SADC EIS
programme seeks to collect, process, exchange, store and present information in a format
that is suitable for making policies, legislation and decisions. The EIS programme in the
sub-region is slowly being intergrated in SOE reporting processes. Collaboration between
UNEP, the World Conservation Unions Regional Office for Southern Africa, the
Musokotwane Environment Resource Centre for Southern Africa, SADC Environment and Land
Management Sector, and SADC RRSU, will result in the creation of a meta-database to
identify and track down data that is required for SoE reporting.
At the country
level, most SADC members have made some efforts to initiate EIS programmes. For example,
Zimbabwe is in the process of harmonising several disparate datasets on land resources,
including complete coverage of forests and vegetation, while Malawi is implementing an EIS
programme to assist in its land policy reform. Tanzania and South Africa have prepared an
EIS strategy and a National Spatial Information Framework, respectively.
However, as with
most of Africa, many SADC countries have weak economies and do not always give priority to
the establishment of information processing systems, which demand substantial investments.
The implementation of EIS EIS-related programmes is therefore, proceeding at varying
speeds, with a lot of gaps in the availability, quality, coherence, standardisation and
accessibility of data within and among member states.
Study
Identifies Regional SOE Needs
By
Tendayi Kureya
A
recent study on state of the environment (SOE) reporting processes in the Southern African
Development Community (SADC) carried out has identified five key issues pertaining to SOE
processes in the region. The study was undertaken as part of the activities under NETCAB.
The assessments were carried out by the Musokotwane Environment Resource Centre for
Southern Africa (SARDC-IMERCSA) and The World Conservation Union Regional office for
Southern Africa (IUCN-ROSA) between June 1999 and July 2000.
The
study involved visits to six countries of the region during which one-day workshops
involving key stakeholders on SOE reporting were convened. A questionnaire was used to
collect information regarding the problems encountered in SOE processes and general
environmental information dissemination. SOE reports produced at the national and regional
level in the SADC region were also collected and analysed based on thsupporting
legislation, objectives, target audience, process participation, workshops, meetings,
contributors, organizational framework, indicators, content, and other supporting
products. The analysis also considered the language used in SOE reports, report launch,
distribution strategy and the influence the report has had on decision making.
The
study noted that the region is at various stages of SOE reporting, characterised by the
following six cross cutting characteristics:
While
it may be accepted that SOE reporting could be an effective tool for providing information
for decision-making, some countries in the region are, or still have to produce their
first SOE reports. Angola, the Democratic
Republic of Congo, Mozambique, Seychelles, and Tanzania either still have to produce their
first reports, or have their reports unavailable in the international public domain. Other
countries such as Botswana and Namibia are in the processes of producing their reports.
The rest have at least a report to their credit. The assessment revealed that countries of
the region could ideally produce SOE reports periodically.
The
analysis identified the pressure-state-response framework as the one predominantly used in
the region. This method involves identifying states of environmental issues; pressures
behind the observed states and trends; and responses to their impacts. Some countries such as South Africa have applied
the drivers-pressure-state-impact-response methodology by the book, while others have
opted to use it only in principle. The result has been reports of varying quality and
volume. Some reports such as the 1998 SOE report for Zimbabwe and the South African SOE
reports on Internet, have applied extensive use of indicators although the issue of which
indicators to use is obviously not resolved. The methodology issue spans across all
practitioners, and it was suggested necessary to develop a regional guide to effective SOE
reporting.
Data
used in the SOE reports is characterised by many flaws. There is a general tendency to use
data that which is available rather than that is needed. Most data is presented in raw
form without further analysis in text to allow the average user to grasp the underlying
information. Data and indicator problems encountered in the region include:
While
cartography has been employed, other techniques such as Geographic Information Systems
(GIS) could have added value to the overall quality of most products. In the cases where
such advanced techniques are employed, there is apparent expertise external to the region
involved, something that is not well in line with the concept of sustainability when such
expertise is withdrawn. Some reports extensively use modern technology such as Internet,
and result in state of the art processes that are easy to revisit and update. The
assessment concluded that traditional thinking to SOE reporting should be complemented
rather than substituted by modern technology.
Most
reports could use more professional publications, the assessment also suggested.
"While considerable effort is put to the writing process, there seems to be
insufficient budgetary allocation for publishing the reports", commented Lovemore
Sola, Head of Programme at IMERCSA, "Exceptions include the reports for South Africa,
Mauritius and Zimbabwe." The publication
process should ideally be followed by a book launch and marketing strategy that ensures
that the report reaches its intended audience.
Lovemore
Sola, Tendayi Kureya, Munyaradzi Chenje based at IMERCSA, and Jacque Chenje, programme
coordinator for the Environmental Communications Information Programme for IUCN ROSA
carried out the country assessments which were conducted in Lesotho, Malawi, Namibia,
South Africa, Zambia and Zimbabwe.
Southern African Environmental Information Centres Take Steps to Develop Regional Thesaurus
By Joshua Chigodora
Steps are being
undertaken to develop an environmental thesaurus for use in library and documentation
centres in southern Africa. The move, being
spearheaded by the Environmental Documentation and Resource Centre Network (EDRCN), is
aimed at facilitating networking and at improving resource sharing among environmental
library and documentation centres in the region.
EDRCN emanated from
an IUCN-ROSA organised roundtable seminar held in Windhoek, Namibia in December 1996, to
establish a network of information resource centres among IUCN members and partners in
southern Africa. The seminar recognised the
need for the establishment of an "effective environmental information network"
that would serve the information needs of environmentalists, researchers, policy makers
and the public, to enable them to make environmentally sound decisions.
Following the
December meeting, another workshop was held in November 1997, again in Windhoek, where the
establishment of the EDRCN was discussed and a steering committee formed, comprising of
documentalists and/or information officers from Africa Resources Trust, IUCN-ROSA,
SARDC-IMERCSA, and ZERO. At this meeting the
need for the development of a thesaurus as a tool for facilitating networking was
reiterated. The thesaurus would form the base
for a common language for use in document processing and indexing both manually and
electronically throughout the region. It
would facilitate better networking as all libraries would be using the same terminology.
Traditionally,
collection development is a very important aspect of information provision services. However, with the development of new technologies
and abundance of information sources, it is no longer enough to have large collections of
information sources, rather, emphasis is now on knowing where to obtain access to any
required information in the right time and format.
To facilitate
better information sharing and networking participating individuals and institutions
should adopt a common language and employ similar standards. While document processing techniques are fairly
standard the world over, languages for document description and indexing are diverse
depending on the need, purpose and geographical area.
Documentalists have
attempted to overcome the problem of language and style of description and indexing by
developing thesauri for use in general situations, in specific subjects or disciplines or
in certain geographical areas.
Unfortunately,
southern Africa has not yet compiled its own environmental thesaurus that fully meets the
needs of information service providers in the region.
Calls for the development of such a tool have emerged from different fora in
the region, among which are the SADC-Environment and Land Management Sector Environmental
(ELMS) organised Information Exchange Network workshop held in Lesotho in 1995, and at
subsequent IUCN regional meetings held in Windhoek in 1996 and 1997.
Thesauri offer
mechanisms for the exchange of information and experiences at local, national, regional
and international levels. They range from
general multidisciplinary, general subject, to special subject compendia.
Most conventional
environmental thesauri in use in libraries and documentation centres in southern Africa
originate from outside Africa and tend to be too general for use in the region. These thesauri in most cases fail to capture the
subject areas appropriate to the southern African environment. For example, the INFOTERA thesaurus does note
recognize SAVANNA, DAMBO and many others, as important keywords for document indexing. Yet these are common terms in the region.
Librarians and
documentalists are caught in a dilemma whether to use the terms anyway, or leave them out
completely. While including them may be
useful at local, national or regional levels, there is a danger that information indexed
thus may be rendered unavailable to an audience outside southern Africa. Even within the region, as mentioned above,
existing databases are indexed using thesauri from Europe.
As a subject, the
environment is multidisciplinary by nature. It
covers a wide range of linkages to disciplines and as a result it would be very difficult,
though not impossible, to construct a thesaurus containing every environmental term. Efforts have been made at institutional level to
develop thesauri that suit institutional requirements, but these have largely been
inadequate especially for networking purposes. Moreover,
these in-house thesauri are only supplements to already inappropriate tools.
In southern Africa,
technological changes in information services, libraries and the publishing industries
have changed significantly over the years. This has made it possible for libraries and
documentation centres to embark on open systems for wide distribution and access to
information. The demands for operating
diverse information and library systems have made it essential that standards be developed
to ensure quality.
It is generally
recognised that society is undergoing a revolution where there is an explosion in the
amount and exchange of information. The
revolution is taking place due to the development of information and communication
technologies. It is universally accepted that
society is developing in this way in a global scale, and that action must be taken to
prepare for the changes ahead as soon as possible especially in southern Africa.
The explosive
growth of interest in the Internet and the worldwide web in the past two years in the
region has created a digital extension of research libraries and documentation centres for
certain kinds of materials. Collections of
texts, images and sounds exist in electronic form and may be accessible from the Internet. Knowledge regarding the whereabouts and status of
material is often passed on by word of mouth among members of a given community or within
formal or informal networks. For outsiders,
however, much of this material is so difficult to locate that it is effectively
unavailable.
A number of
well-designed search engines like Alta Vista and Yahoo are now available that index every
resource available on the web and maintain up-to-date databases of locations. It has not yet been proved that indexes contain
sufficiently rich resource descriptions, especially if the location databases are large
and span many fields of study. If these
resources are to be discovered through a systematic search, they must be described by
someone familiar with the language of the text.
As mentioned
earlier, materials indexed using internationally unrecognised terminology are in many
cases virtually unavailable. It is, therefore, imperative that steps be taken to develop a
southern Africa thesaurus that will be publicised as a southern African initiative.
Water And Wetland Resources Play a Crucial Role in the Zambezi Basin
By Maria Mutama
The waters of the
Zambezi Basin play an important environmental, economic and social role in the riparian
states. According to the State of the Environment Report of the Zambezi Basin 2000, water
facilitates many activities in the basin in industry, domestic use, hydropower generation,
irrigation and transportation.
According to the
report, economic development of the riparian countries is to a great extent dependent on
the availability of water resources. Water is also the driving force in wetland
ecosystems, playing a critical role in the biosphere. The ecological value of water and
wetlands is found in the ecological functions that these systems play in the environment.
The distribution of
water resources in the basin is very uneven and is mainly influenced by rainfall and other
environmental factors. The development of reservoirs also contributes to the uneven
distribution of water. The bulk of the basins water resources are found in lakes
such as Lake Malawi/ Nyasa, Lake Kariba and Cahora Bassa, and in the many rivers and
streams. Groundwater is also an important source of water in the basin
Many wetlands in
the Zambezi Basin posse unique attributes that cannot be described in terms of use,
ecological and hydrological values, says the report. The aesthetic appeal and recreational
potential of wetlands are not easy to quantify in financial terms, but cannot be ignored.
The natural beauty, impressive scenery and large numbers and variety of wildlife, and good
recreational fishing potential makes the Zambezi Basin wetlands popular tourist
destinations and good earners of foreign revenue. For
example, the beauty of the internationally acclaimed natural wonder, the Victoria Falls on
the Zambezi cannot be over emphasized.
According to the
State of the Environment Zambezi Basin 2000, threats to the Basin wetlands include reduced
flows caused by droughts and water abstractions, aquatic weed infestation, pesticides
especially dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane (DDT), infrastructure development such as
dams, overexploitation of resources due to human pressure, uncontrolled fires, pollution
and deforestation, among others. These lead to a number of ecological problems such as
habitat change and species loss, and affect the socio-economic well-being of the peoples
of the basin.
Since
the well-being of the people of the basin suffers from mismanagement of wetland resources,
it is important to note that, throughout the Zambezi Basin, there is a move towards
greater involvement of communities in the management and conservation of water and wetland
resources. In Malawi and Namibia, for example, successful water management arrangements
have been put in place through the establishment of water point committees while in
Mozambique, there are irrigation cooperatives.
Community
based natural resources management (CBNRM) is gaining momentum in most basin countries,
the report highlights. Community controlled hunting areas managed by Village Trust
Committees in Botswana and community conservancies such as Salambala in Namibia,
Administrative Management Design Programme for Game Management (ADMADE) in Zambia and the
Communal Areas Management Programme for Indigenous Resources (CAMPFIRE) in Zimbabwe, have
gained political acceptance and have placed resource ownership back in the hands of the
communities that are most dependent on natural resources.
Public
participation, awareness and empowerment is quite evident in wetland programmes and
projects taking place in the basin, says the report. Under the Zambezi Basin Wetlands and
Resource Utilisation Project facilitated by the World Conservation Union (IUCN ROSA),
local communities are involved in the design and implementation of natural resources
management programmes. Communities manage projects such as the Chobe Enclave Conservation
Trust in Botswana, the Tchuma Tchato in Mozambique, the Integrated Rural Development and
Conservation programme in East Caprivi in Namibia, and other programmes in the Kafue flats
of Zambia.
There is an
increasing trend in public participation in the water resources issues of the riparian
states. As prescribed in the Dublin Principles, stakeholder participation is an important
prerequisite to the success of many water programmes. Many countries in the basin have
heeded this call and are seriously involving stakeholders in water resources planning and
development. The policy to decentralise water management to the catchment level means that
communities have to be made aware of the importance of water and empowered to carry the
work at that level.
By Brian Ligomeka
The most obvious environmental effect of hosting over one million Mozambican refugees from
mid-1980s up to early 1990s in Malawi is deforestation. Many hills in southern Malawi up
to this day still bear the brunt of environmental damage enhanced by the presence of the
refugees who relied on firewood as a source of fuel. The hills in the affected areas
remain bare, despite the fact that the refugees were repatriated some seven years ago.
One of such hills is Nzongwe hill located in Chikwawa district close to the southern tip
of Malawi. "This naked, bare, nude,
treeless, hill will never be the same again. It has lost all its natural glory," many
people in the district used to say.
Poor women around the hill through an afforestation programme sponsored by the Malawi
Social Action Fund (MASAF) have proved wrong all the prophets of doom who preached that
Nzongwe hill will no longer be the same.
The women were advised by MASAF to re-afforest the hill and in return get some cash
allowances. Chief Makuwira of Chikwawa says the idea of involving women in the
afforestation programme came about after he told senior administrative officials in the
district about the Nzongwe state of affairs and the abject poverty confronting his
subjects.
"I told officials from Chikwawa district assembly how degraded the hill was and how
my subjects, especially female headed families, suffered in poverty," says Chief
Makuwira. The district assembly in turn requested the Malawi Social Action Fund (MASAF) to
fund the afforestation
project.
"My advisors and I chose Nzongwe Hill because we know the importance of having it
afforestated. We also realised that it covers a large area and working on it would create
abundant employment for the needy households, while at the same time we wanted to use the
forest for keeping bees and as a source of firewood," explains the chief.
He says he identified poor women to work on the project. "Here a lot of families are
headed by women because men go to work elsewhere. The problem is that men around here do
not help their families financially and as such these families are worst hit by every
pinch of our ailing economy," he said.
Mary Chikadza, one of the women in the area says the project has alleviated a number of
problems she was facing in the past. "The project has been my source of income and it
will continue to be so because when the trees we are planting grow and mature; we will
harvest and sell them," she said. She also said one of her plans is to utilise part
of the future forest for bee-keeping.
Over 200 households
are benefiting from the project in which 40 hectares are being planted with trees. The project is divided into phases. So far about
37,000 seedlings have been planted. The seedlings are for both natural and exotic trees
which were bred by forestry experts in the district.
Work on the project is usually done in the afternoon, two hours every day. The daily wage
or the women working on the project is 30 U.S. cents.
Meagre as the wage is, women in the project are very happy about it. "To be
honest we are happy with the money we receive. after all, this is the first time people at
home are employed," said Enelisi Sitima adding that men have now started joining
their bandwagon upon being lured by the 'remuneration' package offered.
According to a
paper presented by Doris Katai Mwinga, an Environmental Law specialist, in a recent
address to an IUCN advocacy training workshop held in Johannesburg, advocacy has a
cardinal input in participatory approaches in environmental law and policy
development. Participatory approaches are important in that they increase the
probability of developing sound, acceptable decisions by enabling the decision maker to
take into account the collective experience, knowledge, values and judgment of relevant
participants. It also provides the public access to the decision making process and is an
avenue for ensuring that decisions reflect the public interests and promote individual
rights and democracy.
People in southern Africa are increasingly becoming vocal on important environmental
matters, a development that has a positive bearing in directing decision-making. The art
of advocacy has become central to decision making, with people being advised to speak up
on matters affecting them. At the same time governments in the region are encouraging
participatory approaches at all levels of decision-making.
Although
people have always been asked to voice out their concerns in as far as law and
policy-making are concerned, it is only now that many governments are becoming receptive
to the idea. Since time immemorial, people have been encouraged to speak out their minds
on anything that they are not happy with. Martin Luther-King, the famous Afro-American
human rights activist used to say, Dont get angry. Get smart.
Mwinga said that
besides enhancing the consultative process and procedures in the development of
environmental legislation and policy, advocacy also enhances awareness of environmental
legislation, policies and issues.
The workshop observed that the art of advocacy alone does not promote participatory law
and policy-making. In order to be effective, it was established that advocates should make
use of the existing procedures and avenues for law and policy-making, including
constitutional provisions, legislature, environmental impact assessments and international
laws and treaties.
The constitution is
the supreme law of all jurisdictions in southern Africa. It is, therefore, important to
note if the constitution of ones country has provisions for environmental management
before undertaking any environmental advocacy work, said Mwinga.
Namibias
constitution was the first in southern Africa to provide for the protection of the
environment and natural resources. The constitution also provides for the office of the
ombudsman who has power and duty to investigate, among others, complaints concerning the
over-utilisation of living natural resources, the irrational exploitation of non-renewable
natural resources, the degradation and destruction of ecosystems and the failure to
protect the beauty and character of Namibia.
On the other hand,
while the Zimbabwe constitution does not provide for a healthy environment, it gives a
notice period of at least thirty days before it can be amended. Mwinga emphasised that
such time can be used by advocates to influence legislators and the electorate, to bring
about change.
Legislation other
than the constitution follows a different procedure. In some jurisdictions there is no
period between the publication of a bill and presentation to Parliament. While in others
there are provisions, which compel the publication of a bill for a particular period
before it is presented in parliament. This period allows for consultations and advocacy
between the time of publication and the time for presentation to parliament said Mwinga.
Environmental
impact assessments (EIA) ensure that activities that are likely to have significant
adverse effects on the environment are evaluated before approval. Mwinga emphasised that
such EIAs should involve inputs from members of the public and other concerned parties.
Authority deciding approval has to take into consideration all observations made during
the EIA proceedings and final decision must be made public.
The workshop
observed that it is also important to consider advocacy in international law-making and
their enforcement. However, enforcement of international laws may not be direct in many
southern African countries where it is a requirement to enact appropriate legislation that
take into account provisions for international treaties.
Mwinga compared the
situation in South Africa and Namibia where the constitution of South Africa, states,
Any international agreement becomes law in the Republic when it is enacted into law
by national legislation; but a self executing provision of an agreement that has been
approved by parliament is law in the Republic unless it is inconsistent with the
Constitution or an Act of Parliament.
On the other hand,
the constitution of Namibia says that unless otherwise stated in the constitution or in an
Act of parliament, the general rules of public international law and international
agreements are binding upon Namibia under the constitution and shall form part of the laws
of Namibia.
Effective advocacy
depends on the knowledge and understanding of environmental legislation and policy and
their processes in any jurisdiction and on facilitation of exchange of publicly available
information relevant to the conservation and sustainable use of natural resources. The
best advocates, therefore, are those who understand the law.
The SOE
Newsletter is an electronic newsletter aimed at highlighting issues related to State of
the Environment (SOE) reporting in the
Southern African Development Community (SADC) region. The
State of the Environment Reporting Network for Southern Africa (SOENETSA) is a network of
concerned environmentalists, natural resources managers, researchers, scientists and any
other interested parties involved in the environment sector in general, and SOE reporting
in particular.
The
Southern African Research and Documentation Centre- Musokotwane Environment Resource
Centre for Southern Africa (SARDC-IMERCSA) is the regional hub for SOENETSA. Individuals
and organisations are welcome to participate in the network and facilitate in the sharing
of ideas on the region's state of the environment. The sharing of information through this
forum will assist in addressing various questions on the region's environment and help our
societies to overcome the crisis of habitat destruction and overexploitation of natural
resources.
The SOENETSA newsletter is produced as
part of SARDC-IMERCSAs participation in the regional Networking and Capacity
Building Programme (NETCAB), which is managed by the World Conservation Union Regional
Office for Southern Africa (IUCN-ROSA).
This publication was made possible
through the support provided by the United States Agency for International Development
(USAID) Regional Centre for Southern Africa (RCSA), Gaborone, Botswana, under the terms of
Grant no. 690-A-00-95-00950-00. The opinions expressed herein are those of the author(s)
and do not necessarily reflect the views of the USAID.
Correspondence, letters to the editor
and other materials should be addressed to the moderator of this group at
Tel: 263-4-720814 Fax: 263-4-737301
Email:
soenet@imercsa.sardc.net or cep@imercsa.sardc.netWebsite: www.sardc.net/imercs
a/netcab